Why regulatory compliance is causing due diligence headaches
01 Jan 1970 1:00 am
Technology has made doing business across great distances infinitely easier. However, the ease at which businesses can conduct business worldwide leaves them more vulnerable than ever to third party risks. Disruptions due to natural events, malicious attacks and infrastructure failures represent just a few of the dangers. Procurement professionals also have their hands full managing global compliance risks.
It is not enough to have just a compliance blueprint for your own organisation; measures should be put in place to ensure that all your third parties and partners maintain those standards too. Failure to comply with the growing number of global regulations—designed to address bribery, corruption, human trafficking and conflict minerals—can lead to serious consequences, regardless of who is responsible for the contravening act. In fact, according to an EY survey on third-party risk, 55 per cent of respondents believe that third parties constitute a bigger risk than internal staff. The survey found that of those surveyed;
- 57% indicated vendors and suppliers as the biggest compliance risk
- 22% identified agents authorised to act on the company's behalf, as a significant risk
- 12% pointed to joint venture partners as a major compliance risk
- 9% indicated that distributors represented a serious compliance risk
What's this means for procurement professionals
Having robust due diligence and compliance process in place to help mitigate the exposure of doing business with these third parties is essential, especially for businesses with global supply chains. Regulators worldwide continue to crack down on the financial and corporate sectors, with an aim to eradicate money laundering, corruption, fraud, bribery and modern slavery. To help mitigate this regulatory and financial risk and protect your company reputation; a third party screening and ongoing monitoring part of your business toolkit. The costs of non-compliance can add up quickly. Beyond the obvious fines, companies also face ripple effect of expenses, loss of business opportunities, reputational damage and more.
EY's Paul Fontanot said, "Companies must take a proportionate and risk based approach towards entities that perform services on their behalf. Recent prosecutions by regulators demonstrate that companies can be liable for the actions of third parties acting on their behalf."
3 ways to apply this information now
- Download this Procurement Leaders white paper to take a deeper look at how global compliance regulations impact supply chain security.
- Check out how our solutions enable you to confidently conduct supplier due diligence.
- Share this blog on LinkedIn to keep the dialogue going with your colleagues and contacts.