Our website uses cookies. See our cookies page for information about them and how you can remove or block them. Click here to opt in to our cookies
post_thumbnail

Looking forward to PR in 2017

January 06th, 2017 - Posted by Jessica Sinfield in Information Trends, Media Monitoring

With a whole new year stretching out in front of you, it's time to take stock of what trends and changes your department/company is going to face in the months ahead. The next steps for the PR-sphere will likely include a few continuing trends from 2016, alongside a few long-gestating ideas whose time has come. Having the right strategies, technologies and experience in place to make the most of these new developments can give you an edge in 2017.

Pitching at high speed

When it comes to pitching stories to publications, the process may speed up considerably in the year ahead. PR firm Affect recently listed a more complex pitch procedure as a major trend for 2017, based on the fact that journalists' jobs have now become defined by speed and volume of output.

How does a writer make an impact in an environment that's running through content at a record pace? More production is the answer, at least for now, which means it's time for PR professionals to adapt to this style and provide reporters with more grist for stories, especially when it comes to limited pieces of information. Affect called for PR team members to be ready with quick sound bites that journalists can deploy in a hurry. This helpful relationship may enable firms and PR departments to get messages into the hyper-speed news cycle.

Diligence in the press

While the news is likely to speed up, a separate trend recap from PR News explained that publications will be more interested in fact-checking. Following the proliferation of falsehoods and surprising turnarounds that defined 2016, reporters are looking for deeper information than ever to make sure they're not mistakenly publishing any "fake news".

This means being ready with plenty of deep information on demand, to ensure your company or client appears in a good light - but how is such depth compatible with the increased speed described above? Finding the middle ground between high-speed news and a need for verifiable facts will be the challenge in 2017, inspired by the very atypical media year that was 2016.

Companies with human faces

When it comes to dealing with the public and managing your brand reputation, the watchword for 2017 may prove to be "human". Lithium's Dayle Hall, speaking with PRWeek, explained that even though companies dallied with the idea of using artificial intelligence to interact with people in 2016, consumers still crave a personal touch.

Hall compared 2017 and online interactions to the dawn of automated help lines. Companies that thought they were riding a technological wave by taking people out of the customer service equation ended up alienating their consumers, while the old-fashioned organizations scored PR wins by being more human.

Welcome to 2017

The complexities of PR in 2017 will build on the tough experiences of 2016. With the right equipment and preparation, however, you'll be able to keep up. This is one case where your IT preparations may seriously empower your efforts to stay relevant. Media intelligence solutions that can keep up with the high-speed news cycle and give you an in-depth view of outlets around the world may be necessary to stay ahead.

The aforementioned tech, combined with a modern combination of fast reactions and deep insights, will see your team through 2017. In an environment that is evolving and speeding up, there are advantages to be gained for companies that can make changes and adopt new tactics more quickly than their competitors.

Related blogs

How you can apply this information right now

Monitor industry conversations to keep track of what the press and internet are saying. Our innovative technology and premium content – including traditional and new media – will help you transform information into actionable intelligence. Find out more.

What do you think?