Our website uses cookies. See our cookies page for information about them and how you can remove or block them. Click here to opt in to our cookies
post_thumbnail

Is David Cameron ‘supporting’ the Green Party?

February 10th, 2015 - Posted by Claire Barker in Political Media Tracker

Membership of the Green Party has more than doubled in the past three months, reaching more than 50,000 members, with the Party now polling higher than ever in the run up to the General Election. Is this sudden surge in party engagement a direct result of its inclusion in the proposed general election leadership debates?

The big debate about the debate

In October 2014 the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky News announced joint plans for three debates in the run up to the 2015 general election. This proposal included one debate with the leaders of the Conservative and Labour parties, one including the Liberal Democrats and one including the UK Independence Party (UKIP). 

The proposed inclusion of Nigel Farage prompted several other parties represented in the House of Commons to complain and, in late October, the Green Party were informed by the BBC that their requests to be included in TV debates was rejected.

A petition signed by more than 260,000 people demanding the Green Party's inclusion was handed to the BBC, followed by an announcement from the Prime Minister that he would not participate in a debate that omitted the Green Party.

The Prime Minister further expressed concerns over the timings of the debates and how this could impact the profile of the election, calling for the debates to take place at the start and referring to the significant impact the 2010 debates had on the ensuing campaign.

The smaller the Party, the bigger the win

The national debate over the debate seems to have had a significant impact on the election campaign for the smaller parties. As our Nexis analysis shows, the debate has had more of an impact on the media profile of the smaller UK parties than any event in the past year.

Debate

The media profile of both Natalie Bennett and the Green Party remained fairly consistent in 2014, but the national deliberation over the election debates has boosted the profile for both quite significantly, just in time for the beginning of the campaign.

The huge surge in party membership also illustrates a change in the way people interact and engage with politics. This change is driven by the dramatic increase, in the way the public consume and interact with information and news. The popularity of social media and the multitude of platforms and devices that allow people to engage with politics mean that national debates develop at lightning speeds.

Related blogs

3 ways to apply this information now

  1. Monitor industry conversations to keep track of what the press and internet are saying. Our innovative technology and premium content – including traditional and new media – will help you transform information into actionable intelligence. Find out more.
  2. Share this article. Please feel free to share our quality content with your existing contacts and groups to create debate and conversation.
  3. Contact the author. Click here to start a conversation.

Comments

1
  • Silvia 16.03.15

    The machinery of the Party is ctneairly one question the Liberal Party will have to deal with. (... with which the LPC will have to deal. ... whatever)The process just exercised must raise even larger questions for Elections Canada and the law surrounding Party Leadership contests: while I don't have any suggestion of any wrongdoing, this does raise questions about a Party being able to run around the law in the future.The law allows certain financial transactions to be excluded from scrutiny if they are concluded before a Party Leadership campaign begins. The question raised here is whether a Party could have a leadership campaign decided before the campaign officially begins, thereby avoiding the law entirely.Canadians should be troubled by this question, although I do emphasize that this appears to be a byproduct, not a motivating factor, of the current situation. But - how would we ever know for certain who funded MI's ascendancy to the Laurel?

    Reply

Thank you for your comment.

What do you think?